Conservative candidate fabricates "facts"

(gosh, if the Conservatives are going to manage Canada's economy, maybe plagiarism isn't so bad, at least not as bad as acting on purely fabricated "information")

Have a look at this posting by Conservative candidate Brian Abrams in Kingston and the Islands. I took the screen shot in the early morning hours of Oct. 1, 2008. Look at the very bottom where he attacks the carbon tax by using that "fact" the German unemployment rate is 12%. The number immediately struck me as high. In fact, you can easily check online that the German unemployment rate was 7.6% in September and 7.7% in August. Brian Abrams just made up his unemployment number out of the blue.

The link is here but who knows how long it will remain uncorrected.

You know if Mr. Abrams is elected and if the Conservatives are returned to power, he may very well become a cabinet minister. Harper's bench is not very deep. Anything could happen.

With the economic storm clouds gathering, it would be a lot safer to send one less "economic fact fabricator" to Ottawa. Vote for Peter Milliken in Kingston and the Islands!

The Economy: keeping on track may mean being run over

I think the point has to be made that the Conservatives' "keeping Canada on track", steady-as-she-goes, economic management philosophy may be just the wrong thing for an economy threatened by a global recession.

Sometimes staying the course is the most risky thing to do.

The financial crisis that began with the collapse of the (mostly US) housing bubble, spread to subprime mortgages and the credit markets, and became a systemic threat to the financial system is not over. I'm looking at the Interbank Offered Rates in the financial markets this morning and the high rates there show that despite the US government's rescue package, international banks are still reluctant to lend. The effect of this financial crisis on the overall (global!) economy has yet to be revealed and we must be prepared to take action to deal with a possibly severe recession.

Look at the dramatic moves to lower interest rates, open up lending, and take over illiquid mortgage assets that US authorities have had to take.

In the face of an imminent economic crisis, I'm worried that a Conservative government could only imagine sitting tight, like a deer caught in the lights of an on-coming freight train, 'keeping Canada on track' only to let us be run over by a global recession.

The Conservatives' inability to imagine taking bold action: that's risky. Don't let them win votes by taking advantage of the current financial crisis to scare Canadians away from making a change to a government with the ability to admit to the truth and to take decisive, informed, and well-considered action.

Stephen Harper and the conversation the Governor General needs to have with him

Her Excellency, the Governor General (HE), needs to have this conversation with Stephen Harper (SH) when he comes to visit Rideau Hall later this week (in the style of Andrew Coyne):

HE: Mr. Harper, you've come to ask us to dissolve parliament and call a new election, we are told.

SH: Yes, your excellency.

HE: We trust that you are not doing so because you think you could win a majority in the next parliament?

SH: Oh no, your excellency! Certainly not. That would be against the spirit of Bill C16, the fixed election date legislation that my government proposed and parliament passed last year. No, parliament is dysfunctional. It's dysfunctional now. That's why I'm here. We passed a bunch of legislation before but now, now it has become dysfunctional.

HE: We are glad to hear that you are respecting the spirit of Bill C16. We suspected as much when we read what you said, "My expectation would be that we will have another minority. I think that's the reality of the current political environment," when you visited Tuktoyaktuk. Pray tell Mr. Harper, how do you know that parliament is dysfunctional now?

SH: Well, your excellency, I've just had meetings with the leaders of the three opposition parties. We disagree so much on the issues that I believe our government doesn't have the confidence of parliament.

HE: But what if we get another minority government? What will have changed?

SH: Like I said in Tuktoyaktuk, I want to get a fresh mandate out of an election, even if it's another minority government.

HE: But, assuming you win a minority government, the opposition leaders will still be the same, and they will still have the same disagreements with you.

SH: Your excellency, parliament will be different. There will be new MPs, new ministers, new critics, new committees. Parliament will be different.

HE: But you haven't consulted parliament. You've only consulted the party leaders. Mr. Harper, perhaps we should consult with this parliament before we spend $300 million on another election just so that you can empty the opposition parties' coffers, and so leave them in the position of not being able to threaten to go to the polls. (Yes, we have been reading Mr. Flanagan's exposition of your battle plan.) Is that what you really mean by a "fresh mandate"? We are going to have to think about all of this for a few days before we would be able to grant your request to dissolve parliament.

My Suggestion to Her Excellency the Governor General of Canada

The amendment to the Canada Elections Act of 3 May 2007 (Bill C-16) sets a fixed federal election date of roughly four years after the preceding election. The purpose of this Act is to take away the power of the governing party to call an election when it is to its own advantage to do so. The amendment begins, however, with an affirmation of all of the powers of the Governor General, including the power to dissolve parliament at his or her discretion. By tradition the Governor General also acts on the advice of her prime minister.

What is expected to happen in Canada shortly is that the prime minister, Stephen Harper, will ask the Governor General, Michaëlle Jean, to dissolve parliament and call a new election before the next fixed election date of October 19, 2009. He will claim that the current parliament is "disfunctional", a matter of considerable dispute and, I would say, if true, then certainly caused by his own party who, for example, wrote a 200 page handbook for its members on how to disrupt parliamentary committees.

Mr. Harper will be at least circumventing the spirit of his own government's newly passed law, if not breaking it.

I don't know if Her Excellency the Governor General would consider this transgression sufficient to justify denying the prime minister's request, but I would suggest that she at least assert her long-standing role as the ultimate safeguard against abuses of the law and abuses of our democratic system by taking a few days to "consider" her prime minister's request before granting it.